The quality here is excellent — soft leather on the blue panels. Slipping into them, the heel lockdown is noticeable — a proper high-top. On camera, that dark blue looks almost black in some lights — very sophisticated. A definite advantage is the dressed-up sneaker look. A drawback? The price — pushing $200 USD for a GR is steep. I'd say these are for someone who wants a luxury-feeling AJ1. Not the best value — but a premium execution in the line. So I've got these "Air Jordan 1 High" 'Bred Toes' on foot. Man, the leather on this pair feels "really" nice—soft and tumbled. The red accents just pop on camera. Compared to a more modern Jordan, like an AJ37, the tech is obviously dated. But that's the point! The advantage is timeless style. The possible downside? If you need plush cushioning for all-day wear, "look elsewhere". For collectors and style-first folks, it's a must. Who should "avoid" these? If you need modern, pillowy-soft cushioning for all-day wear—look elsewhere. The "Air Jordan 1 High" can feel rigid. Also, if you have very wide feet, that narrow toe box might be an issue. And if you're on a tight budget? There are more comfortable shoes for the price. This purchase is 80% for love of the design. Got these "Air Jordan 1 Highs" in the 'Pine Green' colorway. Love the rich green against the black. Stepping into them, the heel lockdown is excellent. Compared to a Jordan 3, the ankle feel is different—more restrictive, but also more supportive. The clear advantage is its status as a style icon. The drawback? That iconic high-top can feel warm and restrictive in summer. So, perfect for fall/winter fits, maybe less so for hot weather.

  • Shown: Obsidian
  • Style: CT8532-008

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5