You're not buying it for revolutionary comfort. You're buying the look, the history. My pair creased after one wear – and I'm okay with that! It adds character. The flat sole is great for board feel if you skate, but not for all-day support. For $180, it's a fashion piece. It's perfect for sneakerheads and style-focused folks. If you prioritize cushioning above all else, look at the Jordan 3 or 4 instead. First look at the Air Jordan 1 High 'Pollution Grey'. This colorway is super underrated! The mix of grey hues and that icy blue outsole is so clean for a muted fit. Opening the box, the leather feels plush. On-foot impression? The high-top collar gives great support, but the shoe itself has some heft to it—you feel grounded. It’s a stylish, wearable shoe from the Jordan series, but the tech inside is "decades" old. For $170, you're buying a legend. Ideal for minimalist sneakerheads, not for performance basketball. Yo, what's good everyone? Just got the Air Jordan 1 High 'Bred Patent' in hand. The first thing you notice? That patent leather shine is WILD under the lights 🔥. It's a statement piece, 100%. Fit is true to size, with that familiar, supportive wrap around your ankle. Compared to a standard leather 'Bred,' this version is definitely less flexible and can crease... differently. At $200, it's a premium price for a premium look. I'd recommend it if you love bold materials, but if you want a beater shoe, grab the regular leather version. Comparing it to other models — the "Air Jordan 1 High" is the blueprint. Next to a Jordan 1 Low, you lose some ankle support but gain more everyday ease. The High feels more substantial, more “official” if that makes sense. For around $170-190 USD, you're paying for that history and that iconic profile. It’s foundational sneakerhead gear.

  • Shown: Heritage
  • Style: DN3707-160

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5