The silhouette is just... legendary. When you put them on, you get that iconic look that changes any outfit. However, the arch support is basically non-existent for me. If you have high arches, be aware. I'd recommend these to anyone building a sneaker rotation who values history over hype-tech. At around $180, it's an investment in a style staple, not a comfort innovation. Let's be honest about the Air Jordan 1 High. You're not buying it for revolutionary comfort. You're buying the look, the history. My pair creased after one wear – and I'm okay with that! It adds character. The flat sole is great for board feel if you skate, but not for all-day support. For $180, it's a fashion piece. It's perfect for sneakerheads and style-focused folks. If you prioritize cushioning above all else, look at the Jordan 3 or 4 instead. Let's talk about this pair: the Air Jordan 1 High 'Stage Haze'. Unboxing it, I loved the mix of materials—the cracked leather and suede have great texture. On feet, it's the standard AJ1 experience: supportive, but firm underfoot. The advantage is that this colorway goes with literally everything in your closet. The downside? It's not a performance sneaker by today's standards. For $180, you're buying a legend of style, not cutting-edge cushioning. Perfect for casual wear, not for the court. So I'm lacing up the classic Air Jordan 1 High 'Chicago' (2022 version). The red just pops on camera, it's unreal. First impression? It's "the" blueprint. On foot, it's exactly what you expect: iconic, but not what I'd call comfortable for long walks. The pro is its timeless status in the Jordan series. The con is the price—resale is steep. If this is your grail, go for it. If you just want a comfortable red shoe? There are better, cheaper options. It's a heritage piece, first and foremost.

  • Shown: Chrome
  • Style: DZ5485-612

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5