Stitching is on point, and the leather/red hits pop. On foot, the silhouette is just so photogenic — it elevates any casual fit. Pro: timeless style that never goes out of fashion. Con: the ankle collar can be stiff and might rub before it's broken in. Compared to a Dunk High, it feels more structured, less "soft." It's a personal preference thing, really. I dig the sturdy feel. Just got this pair in, the "Air Jordan 1 High" 'Bordeaux'. Wow, that deep purple and black is "really" elegant in-hand. A more mature colorway in the Jordan series, for sure. Putting them on, the construction feels sturdy. They have some weight to them, but not in a bad way—it feels substantial. The leather is decent. Pro: Unique color that stands out from the usual reds and blues. Con: Like all AJ1 Highs, they're not the most breathable. I'd say these are for collectors or style-minded folks wanting something different. Performance basketball players, look at newer models. So I'm lacing up this Air Jordan 1 High 'Dark Mocha'—and the color blocking is just "chef's kiss". For $190, the materials feel premium. My immediate impression? It's a cleaner Chicago. On foot, the toebox creases fast (it's part of the deal!). Compared to a Dunk High? Similar profile, but the AJ1 has that iconic higher ankle collar. Great for fashion, but if you have wide feet? The break-in period can be tough. Just FYI. On feet now – here's the real talk. Sliding into the "Air Jordan 1 High" is always a specific experience. The fit is snug, true to size, giving you that locked-in, secure feel. But let's be real, the comfort? It's not plush. You're getting a firm, stable platform – it's more about style and support than cloud-like cushioning. If you're used to modern, techy sneakers, the break-in period might feel a bit stiff, honestly.

  • Shown: Neutral Grey
  • Style: CU1110-010

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5