In 10 carts
Price: $580
Original Price: $944
Air jordan 1 high : So, this is the "Air Jordan 1 High" 'Midnight Navy' [pqrfsyld]
You can only make an offer when buying a single item
The deep blue is "really" rich under good light—looks premium. Another strong offering in the Jordan series. Fit is consistent: TTS, with great heel and ankle lockdown. They feel more supportive than a Dunk, for instance. The pros? Incredibly versatile and built like a tank. The cons? The tech inside is decades old, so temper your comfort expectations. Personally, I think every sneaker enthusiast should own "an" Air Jordan 1 High at some point for the culture. But for pure, all-day comfort? There are better modern options, honestly. Unboxing this Air Jordan 1 High, the craftsmanship is consistent – no major glue stains or flaws. The silhouette is just... legendary. When you put them on, you get that iconic look that changes any outfit. However, the arch support is basically non-existent for me. If you have high arches, be aware. I'd recommend these to anyone building a sneaker rotation who values history over hype-tech. At around $180, it's an investment in a style staple, not a comfort innovation. Final verdict on the "Air Jordan 1 High": It's a legend for a reason. Whether it's a $180 core model or a pricier retro, you're buying an icon. On foot, they offer great ankle support and a timeless look. The pro is unmatched versatility and history. The con is the dated, firm ride. Who is it for? Anyone who values style heritage and a classic silhouette. Who should avoid it? Those prioritizing cutting-edge comfort or wide feet—sizing can be tricky. For me? It's a staple. After wearing them all day, my verdict? Love the look, accept the feel. The "Air Jordan 1 High" creases — that's part of its charm. The flat, firm midsole isn't for everyone. But standing in line or walking downtown? You'll look sharp. It’s a trade-off: iconic aesthetics for modern comfort. I'm okay with that.
- Shown: Cap And Gown
- Style: 308497-060
4.9 out of 5
(18285 reviews)