0' in hand. First impression? The materials feel great—the grey suede/nubuck is soft. It's a versatile colorway for sure. Sliding them on, the fit is true to size with a snug, secure feel. Compared to, say, a Jordan 4, these are definitely lighter and less bulky. Pro: They go with literally "anything". Con: That break-in period is real; my heels were talking to me after a few hours. Worth it for style, but prioritize comfort? Maybe look elsewhere. Checking out this "Air Jordan 1 High" 'Taxi' colorway. That sharp yellow and black is attention-grabbing! Initial thoughts: the leather quality is pretty standard for a general release Jordan. Sliding them on, the break-in is real—expect some stiffness. Visually, they're a fun, bold alternative. Main advantage is that classic, unbeatable silhouette that elevates any casual outfit. The possible downside? That bright yellow isn't for the faint of heart. I'd recommend these to someone who already loves the AJ1 High and wants a pop of color. If you prefer low-key styles, maybe pass. Putting these "Air Jordan 1 Highs" on... yeah, it's that familiar feeling. The ankle support is great, but let's be real – the comfort is "not" modern. It's a firm, flat ride. Compared to something like a Jordan 11 or even a newer Jordan 3, it's night and day. For me? The look outweighs the lack of cushioning, but if you prioritize comfort above all, this classic might not be your daily driver. Is it worth the $180-$200 USD price tag? For a timeless silhouette like the "Air Jordan 1 High", I'd say yes – if style is your main goal. You're paying for the design legacy and that unmatched look. Compared to some other sneakers at this price, you might get more comfort tech elsewhere, but you won't get this specific cultural cachet. It's an investment in a classic piece.

  • Shown: Black Cat
  • Style: 555088-711

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5