0' "Air Jordan 1", and the materials feel great. The nubuck is soft to the touch. On feet, the fit is true to size—snug at first, but it breaks in nicely. The advantage? Its versatility. The grey and black colorway is low-key but sharp. The potential downside? It's a common shoe. If you want to stand out in a hype-heavy crowd, this might blend in. Unboxing this "Air Jordan 1 High" 'University Blue' was a treat. That white, black, and blue combo "pops" on camera, no filter needed. It's a clean look in the Jordan series. On feet, they feel exactly how you'd expect: supportive, a bit rigid, but super secure. The toe box creases easily—that's just part of the deal with this model. I'd recommend these to anyone wanting a statement sneaker that's relatively easy to style. If you need all-day, cloud-like comfort for walking, this probably isn't your best first choice. First look at the Air Jordan 1 High 'Pollution Grey'. This colorway is super underrated! The mix of grey hues and that icy blue outsole is so clean for a muted fit. Opening the box, the leather feels plush. On-foot impression? The high-top collar gives great support, but the shoe itself has some heft to it—you feel grounded. It’s a stylish, wearable shoe from the Jordan series, but the tech inside is "decades" old. For $170, you're buying a legend. Ideal for minimalist sneakerheads, not for performance basketball. Comparing it to other Jordans... The "Air Jordan 1 High" is the blueprint. Next to a Jordan 1 Low, it offers more ankle presence (obviously). Versus a chunkier model like the Jordan 5? It's much sleeker and lighter on foot. The price, usually between $180-$200 USD, is pretty standard for the series now. Its biggest advantage is pure versatility. You can dress it up or down easier than most sneakers in my collection.

  • Shown: Bred
  • Style: 308497-100

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5