Air jordan 1 high : Comparing this to a newer Jordan, like a 3 or a 4? The "Air Jordan 1 High" is noticeably less cushioned [zpi6yiov]

It's simpler. But that's also its strength—it's pure, unfiltered design. The build on this 'Stage Haze' version is clean. I love the slight distressing. It's perfect for someone who wants a versatile, high-top sneaker that isn't too bulky. So, this is the "Air Jordan 1 High" 'Midnight Navy'. The deep blue is "really" rich under good light—looks premium. Another strong offering in the Jordan series. Fit is consistent: TTS, with great heel and ankle lockdown. They feel more supportive than a Dunk, for instance. The pros? Incredibly versatile and built like a tank. The cons? The tech inside is decades old, so temper your comfort expectations. Personally, I think every sneaker enthusiast should own "an" Air Jordan 1 High at some point for the culture. But for pure, all-day comfort? There are better modern options, honestly. So I'm lacing up the classic Air Jordan 1 High 'Chicago' (2022 version). The red just pops on camera, it's unreal. First impression? It's "the" blueprint. On foot, it's exactly what you expect: iconic, but not what I'd call comfortable for long walks. The pro is its timeless status in the Jordan series. The con is the price—resale is steep. If this is your grail, go for it. If you just want a comfortable red shoe? There are better, cheaper options. It's a heritage piece, first and foremost. Conversely, it's "not" for everyone. If you need all-day comfort, or have really wide feet, "seriously" consider trying them on first. The narrow fit and firm ride are deal-breakers for some. Also, if you prefer low-tops, the high-top collar might feel restrictive. It's a specific vibe.

• Shown: Black Toe
• Style: CD0461-100