Terms of the offer
It's chunkier than some modern lows, which I personally prefer. On-foot feel is classic: minimal cushion, direct connection to the ground. The advantage? That timeless style is unbeatable. The disadvantage? Your feet might get tired on long walks. I'd recommend this to sneakerheads who appreciate the original design language. If comfort is your #1 priority, there are better options out there, period. Comparing it to other Jordans? The "Air Jordan 1 Low OG" is much more low-key than a Mid or High top. It's less bulky, easier to style with shorts. Versus something like a Jordan 3 or 4? It has zero of that bulky cushioning. It's all about the silhouette. The biggest pro here is its versatility and classic look. The con? That classic look means classic, basic comfort. Just keep that in mind. Comparing it to other Jordan lows... this OG version has a "much" better shape than the regular Jordan 1 Lows. The toe box is sleeker, the collar is lower—it's just more refined. My verdict? If you want "the" definitive low-top AJ1 experience, this is it. Skip it if you need plush cushioning. Here's the deal with the "Air Jordan 1 Low OG". I'm reviewing the 'University Blue' pair, and the colors really pop on camera. First impression out of the box was positive—solid construction, no flaws. The on-foot experience is classic AJ1: a flat, stable base. It’s not a squishy ride, but it’s reliable. Compared to the Mid version, the OG Low has a much better shape and materials. I love it for its simplicity and history. At $130, it's a fair price for what it is. I'd recommend it to anyone building a versatile sneaker rotation. If you have wide feet, maybe go half a size up for comfort.
- Shown: True Blue
- Style: CT8532-104
