It's not the most exciting shoe in the world, but it's incredibly reliable. For $120, you're buying into a legacy design. I recommend it to anyone building a versatile sneaker rotation. I do NOT recommend it if you chase the latest comfort tech. It's a style icon, not a comfort one. And sometimes, that's all you need. Putting these 'Chicago' Air Jordan 1 Low OGs on camera, and the red just "sings". It's a different vibe than the High - more relaxed, less bold. Construction feels durable. Walking around, they're lightweight and breathable. Compared to other Jordan lows, the OG mold has the best shape, period. The positive? Instant classic look. The potential negative? The leather quality can be inconsistent pair-to-pair. For a staple colorway at retail, it's a no-brainer. If you need plush cushioning, you'll need an insole swap. After unboxing, I'm really digging the color blocking on this pair. The 'Shadow' style is so easy to wear. On foot, the break-in is quick - no major hot spots. The outsole is thin, so you'll feel the ground... which isn't always a bad thing! It's a confident, grounded feel. This Air Jordan 1 Low OG is ideal for someone who wants an iconic sneaker that's low-maintenance. Not ideal for someone who plans on being on their feet all day. Just being real with you guys. Just got these in — the Air Jordan 1 Low OG in "Varsity Red." The color is vibrant in hand! On foot, the break-in was minimal. They feel narrower than some modern trainers, so wide-footers be warned. The advantage? That timeless Jordan 1 look in a low-cut, summer-friendly package. The disadvantage is the basic, uncompromising comfort tech. I'd say this is a must for Jordan fans completing a collection. For someone seeking the most comfortable shoe? Probably not your first pick.

  • Shown: Neutral Grey
  • Style: DH6927-111

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5