Snug at first, but it loosens up nicely. The 'Air Jordan 1 Low' has a pretty standard fit. Wide footers "might" want to try a half-size up, just to be safe. The materials don't have much give. Overall, the break-in period is short, which is a huge advantage for a leather shoe. You can wear these right out of the box. First impression of this "Air Jordan 1 Low OG"? It's "effortlessly" clean. The silhouette is a bit slimmer than the Retro High, which I actually prefer for a sleek look. On foot, the comfort is standard AJ1—nothing plush, but it's a stable, supportive platform. The major "pro" is its versatility; these go with "literally" anything. The con? If you need modern cushioning, look elsewhere. It’s a style-first shoe, for sure. Just copped the "Shadow" "air jordan 1 low og". Opening the box, that classic grey/black leather combo is "fire". On feet, they feel break-in ready right away. The ankle collar is soft, no rubbing. Versus the Mid version, the OG Low has a much better shape and nicer materials. It’s a clear winner in my book. Who should grab these? Anyone wanting a low-top, go-with-everything sneaker. Skip if you need arch support or a soft ride. Final thoughts on this model: the "Air Jordan 1 Low OG" is a wardrobe essential, in my opinion. This 'Dark Powder Blue' pair is so clean for spring/summer. From unboxing to wearing, it's a straightforward, no-surprise experience. The fit is TTS, the look is timeless. The "pro"? Ultimate versatility and a proven design. The "con"? It offers zero performance features—it's purely a lifestyle shoe. Priced at $130 USD, it sits in a sweet spot. I'd say it's perfect for someone who values iconic style over tech, and wants a low-top that goes with everything. If you need cushioning, this isn't it. But for style? It's a classic.

  • Shown: Obsidian
  • Style: DX2836-001

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5