It's the "Air Jordan 1 Low" "Elephant Print" - a fun take on a classic. The print quality is _actually_ pretty good in-hand. Putting them on... wow, the visual impact is strong. They're a statement piece. Comfort-wise, it's the standard AJ1 Low experience: break-in needed. Compared to a plain pair, these have way more personality. Great for sneakerheads wanting something different. Not so great if you prefer subtle styles. For $130, I think they're a cool pickup for the collection. Final thoughts on this Air Jordan 1 Low 'University Blue'. It's a fresh, classic color combo. The in-hand feel is good, not great. On-feet, they're exactly what you'd expect: a stylish, flat-soled shoe. The major pro is its legacy and unmatched versatility. The con? It won't wow you with comfort tech. So, who is it for? Anyone who values timeless style over cutting-edge cushioning. Who should skip it? Folks who prioritize a plush, modern ride above all else. For me? It's a staple. Comparing it to the high-top "Air Jordan 1"? The "Low" is obviously way more low-profile and, honestly, more practical for daily wear in warmer weather. You lose some of that ankle presence, but you gain a lot in versatility. For $130 (depending on the colorway), it's a great entry point into the "Jordan" series if the highs feel like too much of a statement for you. Let's talk value. For around $110, the "air jordan 1 low" offers a piece of sneaker history. This 'Bred' colorway looks sharp in person. On-foot impression? They're flat, firm, and stable—a classic basketball shoe feel from the 80s. The look on camera is always clean. Pro: Durable build and timeless design. Con: The insole is pretty basic; an upgrade helps. Who's it for? Casual wearers and collectors. Not for people who prioritize modern, plush cushioning above all else.

  • Shown: Pollen
  • Style: DC9533-001

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5