Terms of the offer
The materials are insane - but that's reflected in the $200+ price. The in-hand quality is next level. On feet, they're special, no doubt. However, the "core experience" is the same: same fit, same firm ride. The pros are all in the design and exclusivity. The con is the value proposition vs. a general release. This is for collectors and fans of the collaborator. For most people, a GR "Air Jordan 1 Low" at half the price makes more sense. Alright, so I just got this pair of the "Air Jordan 1 Low" in the "Black Toe" colorway - a "classic", right? First impression out of the box is "solid". The leather feels decent for the $110 price point, and that iconic silhouette is "clean". It's that timeless Jordan series look, just in a low-top version. I'm excited to get these on feet. First impression out of the box? The materials on this Air Jordan 1 Low pair are decent – not amazing, but definitely good for the price point. On foot, they feel snug and secure; the fit is classic Jordan 1. Visually, this low-top version is a bit more understated than the highs, which I actually prefer for daily rotation. A clear pro is the sheer number of colorways available in this model. A potential con is the lack of arch support for some foot types. For about $100 USD in the Jordan series, it's a no-brainer if you want a versatile beater. Not for folks wanting plush, modern comfort, though. On foot, the "Air Jordan 1 Low" just "works". The silhouette is iconic & low-key versatile. I'm wearing the 'Shadow' colorway ("~$120"), & it goes with literally "everything" - jeans, shorts, you name it. The low-top design makes it less bulky than the "Air Jordan 1" High, which I personally prefer for summer. On camera, the details pop - that Swoosh, the wing logo... it's a timeless look, "no" doubt.
- Shown: Gold Hoops
- Style: CT8529-012
