First wear? The insole is basic, but the overall construction feels solid. They look even better on foot than in the box, in my opinion. If you compare it to an Air Force 1, the AJ1 Low is noticeably lighter and less bulky. The advantage here is pure, simple style. The disadvantage? That classic feel means classic, minimal cushioning. For around $100 USD, it's a fair deal for a legend. Ideal for someone building a versatile sneaker rotation. Not ideal for long standing sessions, to be honest. So, is it worth the $115? For me, yes. You're getting a piece of sneaker history in its most wearable form. Just go in with the right expectations: it's not the comfiest shoe ever, but it's one of the coolest. The "air jordan 1 low" just works. Let me know in the comments what you think of this model! Let's talk about the "not-so-great" for a sec. The classic rubber midsole on the "air jordan 1 low" is firm. After a few hours, you might want to swap in a more supportive insole. It's also not the most breathable shoe. But – and it's a big but – its design is iconic. For "$110 USD", you're paying for the Jordan 1 legacy and that flawless look. So, should "you" buy it? Yes, if you want a "classic", low-top sneaker with "history". No, if you need modern cushioning. The "Air Jordan 1 Low" is about style & heritage, "period". It's a "foundational" piece in any sneaker collection. My personal rating? A strong "recommend" for daily wear.
