Also, if you're into technical performance or the latest cushioning, you'll be disappointed. It’s a fashion-first, heritage model. Think of it as a style icon, not a comfort innovator. Keep your expectations in check! Checking out this "air jordan 1 low" with the “Crater” sole—interesting twist! The upper has recycled materials, which is cool. Aesthetics? It’s a chunky, outdoorsy take on the classic. On feet, they feel slightly different: the sole is a bit more forgiving & has great grip. They’re definitely heavier than a standard Low, though. Visually, they add some cool texture to a fit. Pro: Unique design & more functional sole. Con: The weight & bulkier silhouette might not be for purists. At around $130 USD, it’s a premium. I’d say it’s for someone who wants a durable, statement AJ1 Low. Probably not for fans of the OG slim profile. Unboxing this new "Air Jordan 1 Low", I immediately noticed the color is even better in person. The leather has a nice sheen to it. Putting them on... yeah, it’s a break-in period. They’re not uncomfortable, just firm. Compared to some retro Jordans, this low-top version is arguably more practical for daily life. Pro: Timeless design that always gets compliments. Con: The outsole traction isn't the greatest on wet surfaces. For $100-$120, it’s a fair price for a piece of sneaker history you can actually wear daily. Alright, let's get into this pair of "Air Jordan 1 Low 'Black Toe'". The colorway is an absolute classic, & the build quality feels solid right out of the box. On foot, the comfort is... predictable—it’s a firm, flat court feel, not a modern "plush" sneaker. If you want that iconic Jordan 1 look in a low-top, versatile package, this is a fantastic option. Honestly, for the $100 price tag, it’s hard to beat for style. Just don't expect cloud-like comfort.

  • Shown: Obsidian
  • Style: 854262-001

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5