Terms of the offer
Construction seems solid—no glue stains on my pair. Wearing them? They’re "stiff" at first—that’s the main con. You gotta walk them in. The pros? Unbeatable style & they go with literally everything. Compared to a Jordan 1 High, you lose some ankle support but gain a "ton" of versatility. Worth the $115? For a wardrobe staple, yes. For comfort-first buyers, maybe not. Fresh pair of "Air Jordan 1 Lows" on deck. This colorway is a simple 'Black & White'. Opening it up, the construction looks good – no major flaws. The immediate on-foot feel is familiar: secure, no-slip fit. The weight is negligible, which is nice. Styling-wise, you can't go wrong with a black and white shoe; it's a wardrobe staple. Next to an AJ1 Mid, the difference is purely in height and sometimes materials. The advantage here is the classic, low-key style. The downside? That firm, traditional basketball shoe feel. Ideal for someone building a sneaker collection, not for someone seeking a cloud-like walking shoe. Let's talk about the "not-so-great" for a sec. The classic rubber midsole on the "air jordan 1 low" is firm. After a few hours, you might want to swap in a more supportive insole. It's also not the most breathable shoe. But – and it's a big but – its design is iconic. For "$110 USD", you're paying for the Jordan 1 legacy and that flawless look. Checking out this "air jordan 1 low" with the “Crater” sole—interesting twist! The upper has recycled materials, which is cool. Aesthetics? It’s a chunky, outdoorsy take on the classic. On feet, they feel slightly different: the sole is a bit more forgiving & has great grip. They’re definitely heavier than a standard Low, though. Visually, they add some cool texture to a fit. Pro: Unique design & more functional sole. Con: The weight & bulkier silhouette might not be for purists. At around $130 USD, it’s a premium. I’d say it’s for someone who wants a durable, statement AJ1 Low. Probably not for fans of the OG slim profile.
- Shown: Canyon Purple
- Style: CT8012-116
