This "air jordan 1 low" has that iconic Jordan series silhouette, but obviously lower. On foot, it’s light and the ankle collar is "super" comfortable—no breaking in needed. The flat sole is great for all-day wear, though "not" for actual basketball. At $120, it’s a premium price for a lifestyle shoe. If you love the highs but want less bulk, these are it. Not for performance seekers, though. Finally, the "Air Jordan 1 Low" 'Wolf Grey.' This is such a clean, everyday colorway. Materials are standard fare. On-foot feel is the same familiar story: lightweight, flat, and break-in required. The low-cut design makes it perfect for warmer weather or cropped pants. Compared to a bulkier sneaker, these are super sleek. Pro? Versatile and breathable. Con? Arch support is minimal. Priced at $110, it's a no-brainer for a minimalist sneaker rotation. Not suited for long days on your feet or wide-footed folks. Let's talk about this "Air Jordan 1 Low" SE with the woven Swoosh. Right out of the box, you notice the unique texture - it's a nice detail. Sliding them on, the fit is standard. They're definitely a head-turner. The upper feels a bit more flexible than the usual all-leather pair. Advantage: stands out in a crowd. Disadvantage: might be harder to style for some. Priced at $125, it's for the person who already has a few basic Lows and wants something with a twist. Simple as that. Comparing it to other Jordans – like, if you have the Air Jordan 1 High, the main difference is obviously the height and the ankle feel. The low version sacrifices a bit of that "locked-in" support for easier on-and-off. Versus a more modern Jordan? Well, the tech here is basic. It's all about the look. That's the biggest pro: its legendary, versatile design that literally goes with everything.

  • Shown: Georgetown
  • Style: 555088-126

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5