The biggest advantage of this Air Jordan 1 Low? Timeless style. It's a sneaker that never goes out of fashion. The build quality is generally consistent, and it's incredibly easy to style. For a closet staple, it's hard to beat. It just "looks" right, whether you're filming or just out and about. What's good, fam? Unboxing this "Air Jordan 1 Low" 'Elephant Print' edition. The print adds a nice texture right out of the gate. First wear impression? It's a comfortable "low-top" sneaker, but "comfort" is relative. The insole is basic, and the midsole is that classic, unresponsive foam. For daily errands and casual wear, it's totally fine. The design does all the talking – it's a head-turner. Compared to a Jordan 3 (which also uses elephant print), this is a lighter, more streamlined option. Pro: unique look within the AJ1 Low family. Con: premium price (~$115) for basic tech. Get it for the style, not the innovation. Alright guys, first up – this "air jordan 1 low". Opening the box, you immediately get that classic, clean silhouette. My pair is the "Black Toe" colorway – just so "timeless". The build feels solid; the leather has a decent grain to it. At around "$100 USD", this Jordan 1 low version is a solid entry point into the Jordan series. I'll be honest, the insole feels a bit basic, but for style? It's a clear win. Yo, what’s up everyone? So, I just unboxed these "Air Jordan 1 Low" in the 'Sail' colorway, & I’m really impressed with the materials here. The leather feels nice & supple. Sliding them on, the fit is TTS (true to size) for me, with a snug, secure wrap. Compared to the OG high-tops, this low version is obviously lighter & "way" easier to just slip on & go. It’s a perfect summer sneaker. Major pro: its clean, minimalist look. Con? That white midsole will get dirty fast if you’re not careful.

  • Shown: Guava Ice
  • Style: 555088-125

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5