Air jordan 1 low : Comparing it to the high-top "Air Jordan 1"? The "Low" is obviously way more low-profile and, honestly, more practical for daily wear in warmer weather [ljbkfpug]

You lose some of that ankle presence, but you gain a lot in versatility. For $130 (depending on the colorway), it's a great entry point into the "Jordan" series if the highs feel like too much of a statement for you. Alright, so I just got this pair of "Air Jordan 1 Lows" in the 'Black Toe' colorway. First impression out of the box? Man, the leather feels pretty decent for the price - we're talking about $110 USD here. It's that classic, clean silhouette, you know? It's instantly recognizable as a "Jordan" classic, but in a low-top form. Super easy to just grab and go. Unboxing this ‘Bred’ colorway—"wow"—that black & red combo just pops. This "air jordan 1 low" has that iconic Jordan series silhouette, but obviously lower. On foot, it’s light and the ankle collar is "super" comfortable—no breaking in needed. The flat sole is great for all-day wear, though "not" for actual basketball. At $120, it’s a premium price for a lifestyle shoe. If you love the highs but want less bulk, these are it. Not for performance seekers, though. Finally, the "Chicago" "Air Jordan 1 Low". The heritage is undeniable. Putting them on gives you that iconic vibe without the height of the OG. The leather is stiff at first but will mold to your foot. Is it worth it? For a classic colorway at a lower price point than the Highs... "absolutely". It's perfect for collectors and casual fans alike. Just don't expect cloud-like comfort.

• Shown: Bloodline
• Style: CZ6509-100