Terms of the offer
Unboxing, it's a very clean, crisp look. Sliding my foot in, the fit is TTS with a nice heel lock. The cushioning? Let's call it "vintage." You feel connected to the ground, which some people actually prefer! On camera, the all-white midsole pops. Against a Dunk Low, the toe box shape and overall profile are distinct – more elongated. Pro: ultimate versatility and a timeless design. Con: the materials can crease easily. Recommendation? A must for any casual rotation, but not if you need plush, modern foam underfoot. Now, the not-so-great stuff. The obvious con is the comfort, or lack of "modern" comfort. The insole is thin, the midsole is firm. If you're on your feet all day, you "might" want more support. Also, some colorways use stiffer leather that needs a break-in period. It's not a performance shoe, so manage those expectations with this Jordan 1 model. So, is it worth the $115? For me, yes. You're getting a piece of sneaker history in its most wearable form. Just go in with the right expectations: it's not the comfiest shoe ever, but it's one of the coolest. The "air jordan 1 low" just works. Let me know in the comments what you think of this model! Unboxing this pair, the build quality seems consistent – no major glue stains or flaws on my pair. The Air Jordan 1 Low silhouette is just so easy to like. When I laced them up, the fit was TTS with a good heel lockdown. Wearing them out, they get a lot of compliments because the design is so recognizable. Versus a Dunk Low, I find the toe box shape on this Jordan 1 Low to be a bit more refined. Pro: It's a heritage sneaker with a great story. Con: The ankle collar can rub if you're not wearing taller socks. For the USD cost, it's a staple. I'd say it's for sneakerheads and normals alike, but maybe not for wide feet without trying on first.
- Shown: Rookie Of The Year
- Style: DM9036-104
