It's the "Air Jordan 1 Low" "Elephant Print" - a fun take on a classic. The print quality is _actually_ pretty good in-hand. Putting them on... wow, the visual impact is strong. They're a statement piece. Comfort-wise, it's the standard AJ1 Low experience: break-in needed. Compared to a plain pair, these have way more personality. Great for sneakerheads wanting something different. Not so great if you prefer subtle styles. For $130, I think they're a cool pickup for the collection. So, is the "air jordan 1 low" worth it in 2024? After unboxing and wearing this pair, my answer is: it depends. For $110-$130, you get a legendary design that never goes out of style. The comfort is average, but the styling power is a 10/10. Compared to other Jordans, it's the most wearable daily option. Pro: Ultimate versatility and brand heritage. Con: "Basic" by today's tech standards. Get these if you value style history and easy fits. Skip if cushioning is your #1 priority. For the price, it's a solid pick. The major pro here is the style, 100%. It's a heritage sneaker that never goes out of fashion. A potential con? The ankle collar can be a bit stiff at first. If you have wider feet, maybe consider going up half a size in this "Air Jordan 1 Low". Let's talk about these "air jordan 1 low" 'Shadow's. Opening the box, you immediately see why this grey/black combo is so beloved – it's subtle yet sharp. On feet, they're lightweight and the ankle collar is comfortable right out of the box. Compared to other Jordans, these are way more low-key and easy to style daily. Big pro: they're absolute tanks for casual wear. The potential downside is the narrow fit for some people. If you have wider feet, maybe size up. For someone building a versatile sneaker rotation, this is a must-have foundational piece.

  • Shown: Electric Green
  • Style: CT8527-100

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5