Air jordan 1 low : Comparing it to the high-top "Air Jordan 1"? The "Low" is obviously way more low-profile and, honestly, more practical for daily wear in warmer weather [tbqrwhqi]

You lose some of that ankle presence, but you gain a lot in versatility. For $130 (depending on the colorway), it's a great entry point into the "Jordan" series if the highs feel like too much of a statement for you. Who is this "for?" Honestly, "anyone" new to sneakers. The "Air Jordan 1 Low" is a perfect "entry" point into the Jordan series. It's affordable(ish), iconic, and low-maintenance. Not for "serious" ballers needing ankle support, "obviously". But for style? A "solid" 9/10. I’d definitely recommend copping a pair. Comparing it to, say, a regular high-top Jordan 1? The 'Low' is obviously less restrictive at the ankle. It's more of a casual, everyday option. Versus other Jordan models with more tech? There's no contest - this is about heritage, not performance. For $100, you're paying for that iconic style. Final verdict? For the price, I think it's a great pick-up. The "air jordan 1 low" is a certified classic. You're paying for the iconic design and versatility. Would I use it for basketball? No. But for looking good daily? Absolutely. It's a staple for a reason.

• Shown: Infrared
• Style: 384664-060