The materials are a mix, with some stiff panels. The shape is good, though. Comfort is average - it's a flat, board-like feel. The color is really the selling point; it's clean. Pro? It's a less common, easy-to-wear colorway. Con? The comfort won't wow you. Compared to newer Jordan models with better tech, these are about style. At this price, they're for collectors of the silhouette or the color. Not for comfort-seekers. Final verdict? For the price—typically between $110 and $130—the Air Jordan 1 Low is a solid pick-up. It's a piece of history that's easy to wear. I'd recommend it for sneakerheads and casual wearers alike who appreciate a classic silhouette. Just don't expect a cloud-like feel; expect a timeless vibe. The 'Black Toe' Air Jordan 1 Low — a classic reborn! Opening these up, the color blocking is just perfect. That white leather brightens up the whole shoe. On foot, they're surprisingly comfortable for a flat-soled sneaker? Don't get me wrong, it's not Boost, but it's fine. The low profile makes them feel agile. Compared to pricier Jordans, this is an affordable way to get a legendary look. Big pro: goes with "everything". Possible con: common release, so not super exclusive. If you need one reliable, stylish shoe in your closet, this Jordan 1 Low is a stellar choice. Hey guys, let's unbox these "air jordan 1 lows" in the 'Black Toe' colorway. First impression? Super clean. The leather feels decent for this $130 USD price point & the classic silhouette is instantly recognizable. Slipping them on, they feel TTS—a bit narrow at first, but the break-in is standard for Jordan 1s. Honestly, they're not plush, but that's the classic AJ1 feel. Great for casual fits, but maybe skip 'em if you're looking for all-day cloud-like comfort. A solid pickup for any rotation.

  • Shown: Gorge Green
  • Style: DH6927-061

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5