First thought? The materials are "next level" compared to a standard GR. On-foot feel is noticeably better, but you pay for it (we're talking $150-$200+ USD). The pros are unique design and quality. The cons? Price and availability. Stick to the core Jordan 1 Low line if you just want that iconic look without the hunt. Here are the Air Jordan 1 Lows on feet. This 'White Cement Grey' pair is super clean. The flat laces and lower profile make them feel more minimalist than the Highs. Advantage? Incredibly easy to style – shorts, jeans, whatever. Potential downside? The ankle collar can rub a bit at first. For $110 USD, they're a staple. Not the most exciting, but a must-have for any rotation. Just got these in the mail – the "Air Jordan 1 Low 'Craft'" in 'Inside Out'. Priced around $140 USD, you're paying for the deconstructed, premium details. The materials feel a step up, with nice suede and exposed foam. On foot, they're surprisingly comfortable right away – the insole is plusher! They look incredibly textured and unique in person. It's a fresh twist on a classic. Downside? The lighter colors might require more care. Perfect for sneakerheads who already have the OGs and want something with a different story. Not a basic beater shoe. Yo, just got these in – the ‘Starfish’ Orange Air Jordan 1 Lows. Opening the box, that color is "vibrant". Construction feels pretty standard for this model. When I put them on... yeah, it's the classic AJ1 feel: firm, stable, not overly cushioned. They look incredible on camera, that bold color really stands out. Compared to a bulkier sneaker, these are sleek. Pro? Major style points. Potential downside? That bright colorway isn't for everyone’s daily rotation. I'd recommend these to sneakerheads who want a statement piece from the Jordan line.

  • Shown: Bred
  • Style: CT8527-115

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5