The silhouette is, of course, classic—it's an "Air Jordan 1 Low", what more can you say? The fit is true to size with a snug, supportive wrap. I love how low-profile they are; they slide under pants effortlessly. The biggest plus is the style versatility—from streetwear to a simple tee and jeans. The minus? That classic Jordan 1 platform isn't for everyone; it's firm. If you need plush cushioning, this isn't it. But for a stylish, wearable sneaker under $115 USD? It's hard to beat. Unboxing this 'Court Purple' "Air Jordan 1 Low", and the color is just "vibrant". It's a classic Jordan color-blocking at a lower, $110-$120 USD price point. The synthetic leather is easy to wipe clean, which is a plus. On-foot review: comfort is average, it's a lifestyle shoe first. The flat sole isn't for long walks, in my honest opinion. But style-wise? They kill it with jeans or shorts. Compared to other Jordan models, these are the most accessible and wearable daily drivers. Great first Jordan, not for comfort seekers. Alright, let's unbox these Air Jordan 1 Lows in the classic Black/White 'Panda' colorway. First impression? The leather is decent – it's not buttery-soft premium, but for $115 USD, it's solid. The silhouette is just iconic, clean & crisp straight out of the box. A perfect entry into the Jordan series if you're new to the game. Yo, check out these Air Jordan 1 Lows on feet. This is the "Bleached Coral" colorway. First thing I noticed: the materials feel good for the price point ($120-ish). They're surprisingly lightweight! Compared to my Dunk Lows, the toebox is slightly roomier. Great for wide-footers? Possibly! The simple design makes it a wardrobe staple. The only negative for some will be the lack of cushioning. If you stand all day, maybe reconsider. But for style points? It's a top-tier low-top.

  • Shown: Bred Toe
  • Style: DV3742-021

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5