The mix of grey and white is subtle & classy. Honestly, it's a colorway that gets better with wear. On foot, the fit is precise — no heel slippage. They're incredibly light, which is a huge plus for all-day wear. Compared to other Jordan models, the 1 Low is the king of "grab-and-go." The downside? That classic sole offers minimal impact protection. So, it's a fantastic style piece for a wardrobe staple, but maybe not your go-to for long walks. At this price, it's a style investment that pays off. Let's talk about the on-foot experience. The silhouette of the "Air Jordan 1 Lows" is just iconic—it looks good from every angle. Comfort-wise, it's a firm, stable ride, which I actually prefer for casual wear. Compared to a bulkier sneaker, these feel minimal and easy. The big advantage is the timeless design that never goes out of style. A possible drawback? The toe box can feel a bit narrow for some foot shapes. At around $110 USD, it's an accessible piece of Jordan history. Perfect for sneakerheads and casual wearers alike who appreciate the classics. So, I just unboxed this new "Shadow" Air Jordan 1 Low, and I'm liking it. The grey & black suede/leather combo has great texture in hand. On feet, they're light & low-profile, way more casual than a high-top Jordan 1. The break-in is real, though - they can be stiff at first. For $120, you're paying for the iconic look & versatility. If you want a pillowy sneaker, look elsewhere. But for a clean, everyday shoe? This is a strong option. Comparing these to other Jordans? The Air Jordan 1 Low lacks the ankle support and that "high-top" presence of its big brother. But for $120, it's a more accessible, everyday version of the Jordan 1 legacy. It's lighter, more breathable… perfect for warmer days or just when you want less shoe around your ankle.

  • Shown: Neutral Grey
  • Style: 378037-117

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5