That color pop is insane in hand! The suede/nubuck feels nice for this price point (roughly "$120"). Slipping them on, the fit is true to size for me – snug at first, but they'll mold to your foot. Compared to the AJ1 High, the "low-top version" is way more versatile for daily wear in my opinion. Pros? Incredible looks and classic Jordan appeal. Cons? The insole is basic, and the ankle collar can rub a bit. Perfect for collectors and casual wear; not for performance ball. Who should avoid these Air Jordan 1 Lows? If you need arch support or modern cushioning – these aren't it. Also, if you prefer statement pieces, this 'Panda' is very safe (some might say basic). It's a foundational shoe, not the most exciting release in the line. Got my hands on the "Black Toe" "air jordan 1 low". Man, this color-blocking is just "iconic". In-person, the materials are decent - typical for the series. Slipping them on gives you that timeless AJ1 feel: supportive, but you feel the court heritage (meaning, not modern soft). Honestly, as a low-top, this classic scheme looks even cleaner and more casual to me than the High version. Pro: Arguably the best AJ1 colorway, now in a versatile low. Con: They're everywhere, so originality is low. For $120-$130, it's a must for purists, but maybe a pass if you have the Highs. Comparing it directly to other "Jordan" models? The "Air Jordan 1 Low" sits in a sweet spot. It's more accessible than the Dunk Low right now and often more affordable. Versus the AJ1 High, it's a simpler, less statement-making look. For "$110 USD", it's a great entry into the "Jordan series" if you want that iconic look without the high-top commitment. Makes sense?

  • Shown: Gold Hoops
  • Style: DJ5718-300

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5