First impression out of the box? That classic silhouette is just... "chef's kiss". This "Black Toe" colorway & the crisp white leather look super clean. Honestly, for around $130, the build quality feels solid right away. It's a timeless look from the Jordan series that never gets old. Putting them on, they feel TTS with a snug, supportive fit - but that midsole is firm, a classic AJ1 feel. Great for style, not for all-day comfort. Alright, fresh pair of Air Jordan 1 Lows on the table. This 'Dark Powder Blue' version is so clean. Out of the box, everything looks neatly put together. Walking in them, the comfort is there - it's a simple, no-fuss feel. I think the low-cut design actually makes the shoe look sleeker on foot than in the box. Versus an AJ1 Mid, you're getting a very similar look but with a bit less material around the ankle. Pro? A fantastic balance of style and everyday wearability. Con? Some might find the sole a bit stiff initially. For a first Jordan, or a daily beater sneaker, this is a super solid choice at this price point. So, I just unboxed this new "Shadow" Air Jordan 1 Low, and I'm liking it. The grey & black suede/leather combo has great texture in hand. On feet, they're light & low-profile, way more casual than a high-top Jordan 1. The break-in is real, though - they can be stiff at first. For $120, you're paying for the iconic look & versatility. If you want a pillowy sneaker, look elsewhere. But for a clean, everyday shoe? This is a strong option. Alright, let's get into these! Just unboxed this pair of Air Jordan 1 Lows in the 'Chicago' colorway… and wow, that color-blocking is "still" iconic. First impressions? The red leather feels pretty decent for the $110 price point. The silhouette is just super clean—timeless, you know? I'm excited to get these on foot.

  • Shown: Smoke Grey
  • Style: CT8529-162

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5