The comfort, as I said, isn't for everyone – if you need a pillowy ride, look elsewhere. Also, some GR (General Release) pairs can have iffy leather quality... it's a bit of a lottery. And resale on hyped collabs? Forget about it. For a basic low-top, the $130+ USD price tag can feel steep for what you're getting "technically". Airing these out! The "Air Jordan 1 Lows" in the 'Starfish' orange are "bright". For about $115 USD, you're paying for that bold statement. Construction feels solid – no loose threads on my pair. Wearing them, they're definitely on the narrower side, so wide-footers, maybe consider sizing up. Versus a high-top AJ1, you lose some ankle support (obviously) but gain a ton of everyday wearability. Love the color saturation in natural light. They're a fun summer shoe, but that bold color isn't for everyone's rotation. Perfect for adding a pop to neutral fits. Yo, unboxing these "Jordan 1 Low" 'Elephant Print' ones... the detailing is wild! On foot, they're light and pretty comfortable for a low-top. The look is bold, perfect for making a statement without the height of a High. Compared to newer Jordan models? Zero tech, just pure style. Pro: Head-turning design. Con: Might be "too" loud for some. If you love unique collabs and have the confidence, go for it. If you prefer subtle kicks, maybe skip. Yo, what's up everyone? Just unboxed this new pair of Air Jordan 1 Lows in the 'Shadow' colorway. The build quality here is really clean - the grey and black leather has a nice texture. On foot, they feel secure and surprisingly light compared to some bulkier sneakers. The beauty of this model is its simplicity; it's a timeless piece of the Jordan series. A definite pro is the versatility, but a con? The ankle collar can be a bit stiff at first. Still, a classic for a reason.

  • Shown: Court Purple
  • Style: CT8532-008

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5