This 'Stage Haze' colorway with the grey hits is so clean. The rubber outsole provides great traction. My main "pro" is the timeless aesthetic. The "potential con" is the lack of support for high arches or wider feet. Try them on if you can. For most, it's a home-run silhouette. Initial impression of the "Air Jordan 1 Low" 'Starfish'? That orange is brighter in person – in a good way! Construction is standard Jordan fare. Sliding my foot in, the fit is snug width-wise. They feel substantial, not flimsy. On camera, this color just "pops". Compared to a Dunk Low, the toe box shape is slightly different – it's a matter of preference. Major pro is the bold, unique color. Potential con is it might be harder to match daily. At "~$120 USD", it's a fun summer shoe. Ideal for color lovers; maybe not for a first-time Jordan buyer. Let's talk about the Air Jordan 1 Low 'Chicago'. Opening the box, that color blocking is just iconic. It's history in a shoe. Wearing them, they feel great – true to size, nice and snug. The major advantage is the timeless style. The flip side? Everyone has them, so it's not a unique flex. Worth it? Yes, if you want a piece of the Jordan legacy on a lower-profile silhouette. Unboxing these was a vibe. The leather quality on this pair is actually pretty nice for the price point—no complaints here! On foot, the "Air Jordan 1 Lows" feel light and low-profile, perfect for summer. Compared to the OG Highs, they're less restrictive around the ankle, way easier to just throw on and go. The main pro is their timeless style; they go with literally everything. The con? That flat, firm footbed. Not for everyone, especially all-day wear. If you want a classic look over cloud-like comfort, these are for you.

  • Shown: Seafoam
  • Style: 555088-404

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5