.. basically "nonexistent". It's a cupsole from the "1980s". If you're on your feet all day, these "aren't" your best bet. Also, the "toe box" creases "super" easily - that's just the nature of the leather. If you're a comfort-first sneakerhead, this might be a dealbreaker. So I just unboxed this pair of 'Shadow' Air Jordan 1 Lows, and wow — the colorway is even better in person? The dark grey and black combo is super versatile & looks premium. Sliding them on, the fit is snug (I'd say TTS) and that low-cut profile is fantastic for ankle mobility. Compared to the AJ1 Highs, these are way more casual & easier to style with shorts. Major pro: they go with literally everything. The con? That flat, firm midsole. If you need plush cushioning, look elsewhere. For style points and everyday wear, though? These Jordan Lows are a total win. My immediate thought pulling these "Air Jordan 1 Lows" out? "Yep, that's the shape I know." It's a timeless profile. The synthetic leather on this specific pair is a bit stiff, but that's common. Wearing them, the heel lockdown is secure, and the toe room is adequate. For casual wear, they're perfect. They lack the tech of newer "Jordan" models, but that's not the point. Pro: You're buying an icon. Con: You're not buying cutting-edge comfort. It's an essential for style-focused folks. If you need plushness, consider a Jordan 1 Zoom CMFT or a different line altogether. Alright, let's get these out of the box. First impression? The "classic" silhouette of the "air jordan 1 lows" is just "undeniable". This 'Shadow' colorway is super clean in-hand... the materials feel pretty standard for this price point (~$100), but the build quality is solid. That iconic shape? It's "always" a winner. You know "exactly" what you're getting with this "Jordan" series staple.

  • Shown: Neutral Grey
  • Style: CT8527-115

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5