I got this "White Cement Grey" pair for about $135. Opening the box, it's just a simple, effective design. On foot, the comfort is... okay. It's not terrible, but it's a flat, board-like feel - that's the trade-off for that sleek profile. Compared to a Jordan 1 High, it's less restrictive. The major pro is the look: it goes with everything. Con? It's a lifestyle shoe, not for performance. Yo, straight up? This 'Atmosphere' colorway of the "Air Jordan 1 Low" is a sleeper hit. For ~$130 USD, you're getting a super unique, almost pastel vibe that pops on camera. The quality? It's standard Nike/Jordan fare – nothing insane, but totally fine. On feet, they're true to size with a secure, familiar fit. Compared to a Dunk Low, the toe box is slightly roomier (which I prefer!). They're a great canvas for creative outfits. Just know: the suede can be a dirt magnet. Great for collectors who want something different. Compared to other lows on the market, the "Air Jordan 1 Low" has that unbeatable profile. This 'Stage Haze' colorway with the grey hits is so clean. The rubber outsole provides great traction. My main "pro" is the timeless aesthetic. The "potential con" is the lack of support for high arches or wider feet. Try them on if you can. For most, it's a home-run silhouette. Finally, the 'Taxi' colorway of the Air Jordan 1 Lows. Unboxing: that bold yellow is awesome – great summer energy. The build is consistent with the line. On-foot impression? Snug fit, classic Jordan 1 feel underfoot. They absolutely stand out in a crowd. The major pro is the color – it's a mood-lifter. The con? Same as others: basic cushioning. At $110, it's a fair price for the style. I suggest these if you love standout colors and the iconic Jordan series silhouette. Avoid if you prefer your sneakers to blend in.

  • Shown: Space Jam
  • Style: 555088-302

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5