Unboxing: clean, simple, great for a muted fit. The quality is standard for the line - no complaints. When I walk around in them, the outsole is nice and flexible. They feel broken-in from the first wear. Visually, they're super photogenic - that low profile works from every angle. Pro? Ultimate versatility and comfort. Con? At around $110, some might want more tech or premium materials. If you're new to the Jordan series and want one pair that does it all, start with a neutral low like this. Performance basketball players, look elsewhere. So I got my hands on the Air Jordan 1 Low 'Starfish'. Opening the box, that orange is vibrant! The shape is on point. Wearing them, they feel light & fairly breathable. Compared to an AJ1 Mid, the collar height is the biggest difference - less restrictive. Pro? They're incredibly easy to style with shorts. Con? The outsole traction is just okay for actual ball. At this price point, they're for fashion, not performance. Perfect for a casual summer rotation. Let's talk about the elephant in the room—the ""comfort"" (or lack thereof) in the Air Jordan 1 Lows. Look, they're a flat, court-based shoe from the 80s, updated. The ankle collar can rub some people the wrong way. That said, I love 'em for short outings & the style is timeless. If you need all-day support, go for a modern Jordan like the 3s or 5s. But for a classic vibe? These Lows, especially in an OG color, are still a must-have. So, how do they "look" in real life? Man, the "Air Jordan 1 Low" just works with everything. Jeans, shorts, joggers – it's a style chameleon. This 'Shadow' colorway is especially versatile. The low-cut profile gives you way more ankle mobility than the Highs. On camera, that clean toe box and swoosh just pop. It’s a simple, effective design that never gets old.

  • Shown: University Blue
  • Style: 378037-005

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5