The Air Jordan 1 Low can feel stiff and unforgiving, especially on concrete. Also, if you're into performance basketball sneakers… this isn't it. It's a lifestyle shoe through and through, built on a 40-year-old design. Keep that in mind! Okay, just got these in the 'Dark Powder Blue' colorway. Opening the box, the color-blocking is "fire" — a really nice twist on a classic. Putting these Air Jordan 1 Lows on, the fit is TTS for me. The flat sole and lack of arch support might bother some — that's the honest take. But for short wears, outings, they're totally fine. A major pro is how easy they are to style with jeans or shorts. At this price in the Jordan line, you can't go wrong for a rotation staple. Not for comfort-seekers, but for sneakerheads? Absolutely. Initial impression of the "Air Jordan 1 Low" 'Starfish'? That orange is brighter in person – in a good way! Construction is standard Jordan fare. Sliding my foot in, the fit is snug width-wise. They feel substantial, not flimsy. On camera, this color just "pops". Compared to a Dunk Low, the toe box shape is slightly different – it's a matter of preference. Major pro is the bold, unique color. Potential con is it might be harder to match daily. At "~$120 USD", it's a fun summer shoe. Ideal for color lovers; maybe not for a first-time Jordan buyer. Opening this box, the "Air Jordan 1 Lows" ('Neutral Grey') look even better in person. That shape is just iconic. My true-to-size fit perfectly—good heel lockdown. The feel is... basic? No Zoom, no crazy cushion. Just a flat, stable base. The "benefit" is the timeless design that never goes out of style. The drawback is the basic performance. Ideal for style-focused wear, not for ball or long walks. A must-have for purists, but performance seekers, look elsewhere.

  • Shown: Red Thunder
  • Style: 378037-003

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5