' This color is always a winner. Materials feel good, not great, for the $120 USD tag. On my feet, the fit is true and the low-cut allows full ankle mobility—a plus over the highs. The white/blue combo is crisp and photogenic. Pro: it's a crowd-pleasing, clean colorway. Potential downside? It's another firm Jordan 1 ride. Perfect for casual wearers and Jordan fans who prefer the low profile. I wouldn't recommend it to someone on their feet all day looking for maximum cushioning. On camera, this "University Blue" colorway of the "air jordan 1 lows" really pops. The white leather panels make the blue stand out even more. It's a perfect summer sneaker from the "Jordan series". My main pro? Incredible versatility. You can dress these up or down so easily. The con? That white toe box is a scuff magnet – you have to be a little careful. Now, who might "not" love these? If you need serious arch support or a soft, bouncy ride – these aren't it. Also, if you have super wide feet, the break-in could be tough. The "air jordan 1 lows" is about that classic, slightly narrow fit. It's not the most "teched-out" shoe, but that's kinda the point. It's fashion and heritage first. Comparing these "Air Jordan 1 Lows" to the Highs? The biggest difference is obviously the ankle freedom. The Lows are way easier to just slip on and go. Stylistically, I think the Lows can sometimes look even cleaner with shorts, while the Highs have that undeniable, iconic presence. For versatility – and often a lower price point – the Low wins for me.

  • Shown: Georgetown
  • Style: DZ5485-303

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5