.. this "Air Jordan 1 Mid SE" has a really clean, almost premium feel. The materials on this specific colorway are solid—nothing super-luxe, but definitely a step above your standard GR. The shape? It's that classic Jordan 1 silhouette we all love, just in the Mid cut. For the price point, around $135 USD, I'm pleasantly surprised by the initial quality here. The construction looks tight, no major glue stains or anything sloppy. Unboxed this pair, and my first thought was, "Yep, that's a classic." The shape is on point. Wearing them, you get that secure, locked-down feel Jordan 1s are known for. They're not heavy, but they're substantial. This model is perfect for someone who wants "the look" without the hype or the highest price tag. It's a straightforward, no-regrets kind of sneaker. Let's talk about the SE (Special Edition) part. Often, it means better materials or unique details—and here, it shows. The "Air Jordan 1 Mid SE" just has a cleaner execution. On foot, the profile is sharp. Comfort is "fine"; it uses a standard PU sockliner and cupsole. Compared to an Air Jordan 1 Low, it provides more ankle structure. Pro: You stand out in a crowd of basic sneakers. Con: The flat footbed might not suit everyone for long walks. Ideal for casual wear, not for, say, a full day of tourism. What's good, everyone? Just unboxed this 'Atmosphere Grey' Air Jordan 1 Mid SE. Honestly, the materials—especially that suede/nubuck combo—are a nice step up from some standard Mids I've seen. Weighs in light on the foot, and that SE (Special Edition) detail on the wings logo is a cool touch. For $135, it's a solid pick-up. However, the break-in period is real; the collar might rub a bit at first. I'd recommend these if you value materials over hype. If you want super plush comfort right away, maybe look elsewhere.

  • Shown: Yellow Toe
  • Style: DC9533-001

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5