This 'Light Smoke Grey' colorway is subtle and goes with everything. After breaking them in, they become decently comfortable for short periods. The advantage? That iconic look never goes out of style. The disadvantage? They can feel a bit heavy and clunky compared to a running shoe. For ~$120 USD, it's a style investment. Perfect for casual use, not for your gym session. The potential downside? Some colorways use stiffer materials. Always check reviews for the specific pair! My "Court Purple" version here is decent. It's a trade-off: you get the legendary Jordan 1 look at a great price, but maybe not the "absolute" best materials. For me, that's a fair deal. The Air Jordan 1 Mid remains a go-to for a reason. Reviewing this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" 'Chicago Black Toe' inspired pair. Opening the box gives you that iconic vibe immediately – the red, black, and white just works. The build feels sturdy; no complaints for the price point. Slipping them on, the ankle collar is stiff initially, but it'll mold to your ankle. Compared to a true OG High 'Chicago,' you're missing some height and history, but the core style is 95% there for less money. The big pro is capturing that legendary look affordably. The trade-off? You might get "it's not the High" comments from sneakerheads. In my view, this is perfect for fans of the Chicago color blocking who want a more accessible and often more available option. Hardcore OG collectors will likely still hold out for the High. Who is this for? Honestly, it’s perfect for someone entering the sneaker game, or for a casual fan who loves the Jordan 1 style but doesn’t want to hunt down rare Highs. For $115 USD, it’s an entry point into the Jordan series. It’s also great for collectors who want a specific colorway that only releases in a Mid cut. It serves a real purpose.

  • Shown: Neutral Grey
  • Style: CT8012-011

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5