The Black/White pair, priced at $125 USD, offers great versatility for outfits. On foot, the comfort is average – fine for short trips but not for all-day wear. Compared to pricier Jordans, it holds its own in looks. I'd recommend it to anyone wanting that classic basketball sneaker aesthetic without breaking the bank. But if comfort is your top priority, you might want to explore other options in the Jordan family. Final verdict? For the "price point of ~$120 USD", the "air jordan 1 mid" offers incredible value. You get an iconic design, durable construction, and tons of color options. Is it the most comfortable shoe in my rotation? No. But for style-per-dollar, it's hard to beat. I'd recommend it to any casual sneakerhead or someone building their collection. Serious comfort seekers, be warned. Unboxing this new Air Jordan 1 Mid colorway... wow, the color-blocking is actually "fire". The leather has a nice sheen to it! On foot, the break-in period is real – you'll feel that around the pinky toe, no cap. It's a bit heavier than I remembered, but the silhouette is just iconic. The pros? Style, history, and endless outfit options. The cons? Arch support isn't the best, and the cushion is basic. For a sneakerhead wanting a classic Jordan vibe without the crazy resale? Perfect. For performance? Not even close. Unboxing this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" "Altitude Green" and my first thought is: "This leather will crease, and that's okay." It's part of the story! Wearing them feels nostalgic — takes me back. The traction is good on dry surfaces, and the padded tongue is a nice touch. Is it worth the $125? As a piece of sneaker culture, absolutely. As a pinnacle of foot technology? No way. I'd steer a basketball player toward modern Jordans, but I'd tell a fashion-head this is a must-consider.

  • Shown: Pollen
  • Style: 555088-403

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5