The materials feel good – a nice mix of leather and synthetic. On foot, they're... exactly what you'd expect from a Jordan 1. The mid-top gives decent ankle support for casual wear, but let's be real: the ride is pretty stiff. That's just the DNA of this model. I love the look, and for ~$130, it's a more accessible way to get that classic Jordan vibe compared to some High OG releases. A wardrobe staple, for sure. This 'Light Smoke Grey' pair is my personal favorite. Such a versatile, elevated neutral. On foot, it goes with literally everything – jeans, sweats, shorts. The "air jordan 1 mid" really shines as a style staple. The break-in was real for me – the heel rubbed a bit day one. After a few wears? It molded nicely. It's a sneaker you grow into, both in comfort and style. Unboxing this Air Jordan 1 Mid SE with the different materials... interesting! The suede/nubuck combo feels nice. First wear? The break-in is real, guys – give it a few wears. It's a bit clunky, but that's part of the charm. On foot, the Mid profile is actually more flattering for shorter fits than the High, IMO. Major pro: timeless design that goes with everything. Potential con: the ankle padding can feel rough at first. I'd say this is perfect for a style-focused wardrobe staple. Performance basketball players? Look at newer models. Opening the box, the air jordan 1 mid's profile is just iconic – that never gets old! For this Black/White pair at $125, the value is there if you want a classic. When I walk in them, the support is good, but the break-in period is real. Cameras love this shoe; it always looks sharp. Main advantage? Timeless aesthetics. Downside? The midsole is pretty stiff. Great for style-focused folks, but probably not the best pick for people with wide feet or those needing plush cushioning.

  • Shown: Bloodline
  • Style: DC9533-800

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5