Air jordan 1 mid : Who should maybe look elsewhere? Serious comfort seekers — try something with more modern tech [4ssdsug6]

Also, if you have very wide feet, the fit might be too restrictive. And if you're a die-hard OG Jordan 1 High fan who thinks the Mid "isn't the same," well, you already know your answer. Here's my real take: the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" gets some hate, but it's unjustified. This 'Barely Orange' pair has amazing materials! On feet, they're comfortable for casual wear. The mid-top height is the sweet spot for me – it's supportive without feeling restrictive. Cons? The outsole is thin; traction is just okay. But for $120? You're paying for the iconic look and it delivers. Okay, here's my real take on the "Air Jordan 1 Mid". You're not getting groundbreaking tech here – it's a 1985 design, updated. The ankle padding is thinner than the Highs, which I actually prefer for casual wear. It's a style-first shoe, part of the core "Jordan series". At around $120 USD, it's an accessible entry point. Fantastic for beginners in the sneaker game. Not so fantastic for performance basketball – that's not what it's for anymore. So I'm lacing up this Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Chicago'... man, that color blocking is "iconic". The build is pretty standard for Mids – decent but not amazing. On foot, it's true to size with a secure fit. The insole is thin, so I might swap it. Visually, it's a 10/10 – such a statement piece. Compared to a Dunk High, the AJ1 Mid has more of that "heritage" feel. Great for collectors or just rocking a classic. Not so great if you're on your feet all day. Honestly? For $125, you're paying for the look, not groundbreaking tech.

• Shown: Rookie Of The Year
• Style: CT8527-700