Construction feels standard for the line – durable and well-put-together. On-foot, they're lightweight and easy to move in, which I appreciate. The mid-cut provides good ankle support for casual use without feeling restrictive. The major pro here is the bold, standout color – perfect for adding a pop to neutral fits. The con? Such a bright color can be harder to style daily, and it might show dirt easily. I'd recommend this to anyone wanting to add a fun, seasonal color to their rotation. If you prefer only neutral, go-to-everything sneakers, this loud "Air Jordan 1 Mid" might not be your daily driver. Unboxing this new 'Court Purple' Mid, and wow, that color is vibrant in person! The quality feels consistent, nothing premium but solid. Wearing them, they're definitely flat-footed - no Zoom or anything fancy here. Compared to newer Jordan models, it's all about style over tech. Pro? You get that legendary Jordan 1 look. Con? Arch support is minimal. If you're on your feet all day, consider an insole. For short outings and fits? A winner. Alright, so, first look out of the box — this ‘Light Smoke Grey’ "Air Jordan 1 Mid" feels premium. The leather is decently soft, not cardboard-stiff, which is a nice surprise for the $125 price point. I’m digging the clean, wearable color-blocking straight away. It’s a classic "Jordan" silhouette that just works. Here's my take after a full day in these "Air Jordan 1 Mids". The "GS" version for my niece was a solid gift idea. The main "benefit" is the timeless design. On the flip side, the arch support is minimal—not ideal if you're on your feet all day. Compared to a Jordan 1 Low, the Mid offers a bit more structure. For $115-$135 USD, you're paying for the legacy and look. It's perfect for teens and sneakerheads who value style history.

  • Shown: Midnight Navy
  • Style: BQ4422 100

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5