.. classic. The cushioning is firm—you're not getting modern, bouncy comfort here. It's more about that secure, locked-down feel. The ankle support is good for casual wear, not for balling. The design is timeless, though—a true sneakerhead staple. Yo, checking out this new "Air Jordan 1 Mid" SE with the altered materials – this one has some suede panels. Opening the box, the texture mix really makes it pop, giving a premium feel over the standard all-leather versions. Sliding my foot in, the fit is consistent: snug in the heel, roomy in the toe box. Wearing them, the SE details get you compliments – it stands out from the basic Mids. A huge pro is the unique look without a crazy price hike (around $125). A potential con? Suede can be harder to maintain than plain leather. In my opinion, if you already have a core "Jordan 1 Mid" colorway and want something with more character, this SE is a great pick. If you're rough on your shoes or live in a rainy area, maybe reconsider. Pulling these out of the box, the shape on this particular "Air Jordan 1 Mid" is on point. Lacing them up, the break-in is real – expect some stiffness at first. The visual appeal is undeniable; it's a shoe that gets compliments. Pros? Iconic status, durable construction, and a lower profile than the Highs. Cons? Arch support is minimal, and the sole is flat. I'd recommend it for style-focused wardrobes, but not for people with serious foot support needs. Comparing it to other Jordans? The Mid sits, well, in the middle. It’s more affordable than most Highs (this pair is $115), and it’s got more presence than a Low for me. The build quality on this specific ‘Mid’ is good—no major glue stains or anything. A clear advantage is the classic look without the classic High-top price hike, which is a huge pro for a lot of sneakerheads on a budget.

  • Shown: Bred
  • Style: 555088-013

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5