Pros? Unbeatable classic style, goes with literally everything, and the durability is usually pretty good. Cons? That footbed is flat and firm – it's not a "comfort" sneaker by today's standards. For $120-$135, you're paying for the iconic design from the Jordan series. I'd recommend it to anyone building a sneaker rotation who needs a versatile pair. Not recommended if your priority is cloud-like comfort for long walks. My first thought unboxing? The air jordan 1 mid looks clean and well-made – no complaints on craftsmanship! Wearing them, the weight is manageable, and the fit is snug around the midfoot. Compared to other Jordan 1s, this Mid version is more affordable at $125. Pros: easy to match and durable. Cons: the ankle padding could be softer. It's a go-to for casual sneakerheads, but if you're into high-performance basketball shoes, this isn't it. A solid, everyday option from the Jordan lineup. First look at this 'White Gym Red' Air Jordan 1 Mid. Super crisp and easy to match. Trying them on, the toe box has a bit more room than I expected - maybe go half size down if you like a snug fit. The mid-top height is actually perfect for showing off your socks. Pro? A fantastic canvas for customizing. Potential downside? The all-white leather can scuff easily. For a clean, affordable Jordan 1, it's a great pick-up, honestly. First try-on of the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" – immediate thoughts? The collar height is perfect for showing off your socks. The materials are what you'd expect for the $120 USD price tag: good, not great. Visually, the Mid offers a cleaner, slightly more modern proportion than the High, in my opinion. It's excellent for adding that sneakerhead touch to an outfit without being too loud. Not excellent for wide-footers; it runs a bit narrow. Know your fit!

  • Shown: Black Toe
  • Style: 555088-711

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5