Opening the box gives you that iconic vibe immediately – the red, black, and white just works. The build feels sturdy; no complaints for the price point. Slipping them on, the ankle collar is stiff initially, but it'll mold to your ankle. Compared to a true OG High 'Chicago,' you're missing some height and history, but the core style is 95% there for less money. The big pro is capturing that legendary look affordably. The trade-off? You might get "it's not the High" comments from sneakerheads. In my view, this is perfect for fans of the Chicago color blocking who want a more accessible and often more available option. Hardcore OG collectors will likely still hold out for the High. Final verdict on the Air Jordan 1 Mid: Who is it for? Someone who wants the iconic Jordan 1 style at a more accessible price and with easier wearability. It's great for daily drivers. Who should skip it? Performance basketball players or comfort chasers. You're here for the heritage, the silhouette, and that timeless Jordan series magic. For that, it delivers exactly what it promises. Alright, let's unbox these! First impressions - this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" in the 'Metallic Silver' colorway is clean. The leather feels decent for the $120 USD price point, not super premium, but it has a nice sheen. That classic silhouette is just "timeless" - you can't go wrong with it. Straight out of the box, it's a solid pickup for the collection. Comparing it to other Jordans? The Mid sits, well, in the middle. It’s more affordable than most Highs (this pair is $115), and it’s got more presence than a Low for me. The build quality on this specific ‘Mid’ is good—no major glue stains or anything. A clear advantage is the classic look without the classic High-top price hike, which is a huge pro for a lot of sneakerheads on a budget.

  • Shown: University Blue
  • Style: CT8012-011

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5