Straight out the box, the leather quality is solid for the price point, honestly. On foot, the fit is TTS, and the lockdown is good, but let's be real – cushioning is firm, it's a vintage feel. For $120 USD, it's a staple. It's perfect for someone who wants that iconic Jordan 1 look without the high-top price. If you need plush comfort, though, look elsewhere. Final thoughts on the Air Jordan 1 Mid: It's a staple. Unboxing always feels special because of that timeless design. On foot, they make any casual fit look better. The clear advantage is the iconic style and relative affordability versus Highs. The downside? The dated, firm ride. I recommend it to sneakerheads and style-minded folks who appreciate the heritage. I don't recommend it to people who prioritize modern comfort above all else. It's a classic for a reason – but it shows its age in feel. Trying these on, the air jordan 1 mid provides a classic, locked-down feel – it's what you expect from the Jordan series! The Black/White配色 is a safe bet that always looks good. At $125, the price point is reasonable for a Mid. However, the insole isn't the most supportive for long periods. Advantage? That unbeatable silhouette. Drawback? Limited innovation in comfort. Ideal for style enthusiasts and those new to Jordans; not the best for people needing arch support or extensive cushioning. Alright, let's get into this pair of "Air Jordan 1 Mids" I just picked up. First off? The "White Shadow" colorway is so clean in-hand. The leather feels pretty decent for the $125 USD price tag—not super premium, but it's solid. Unboxing it, that classic Jordan 1 silhouette is just "timeless". If you're new to the Jordan series, this Mid is a perfect, affordable entry point. Just know, the ankle collar is a bit stiffer than the Highs.

  • Shown: Georgetown
  • Style: 555088-126

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5