Air jordan 1 mid : Comparing it to other Jordans? The Mid sits, well, in the middle [7kzd5y20]

It’s more affordable than most Highs (this pair is $115), and it’s got more presence than a Low for me. The build quality on this specific ‘Mid’ is good—no major glue stains or anything. A clear advantage is the classic look without the classic High-top price hike, which is a huge pro for a lot of sneakerheads on a budget. Opening this box, the 'Court Purple' "Air Jordan 1 Mid" looks even better in person. The colors are vibrant. On foot, it's that classic, slightly elevated feel. Comparing it to other Jordans, like a Jordan 3 or 4, the tech is simpler here. But sometimes, you just want that clean, high-top(ish) silhouette without the bulk. Pro: Unmatched versatility for the price. Con: The materials can vary by colorway, so do your research. Just got this "Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Ice Blue'" in. The color pops! In terms of craftsmanship, everything looks clean—no glue stains I can see. Wearing them, the ankle support is less than a High, which could be a "pro or con" depending on your preference. They feel lighter, which I like. Honestly, if you're looking for a statement sneaker in the Jordan series that won't break the bank, this Mid delivers. Not for performance basketball, obviously. Sliding these on… the fit is true to size for me. The ankle collar on the "air jordan 1 mid" is definitely lower than the Highs, which gives a different feel—less restrictive, honestly. The cushioning? Let’s be real, it’s firm. You’re not buying these for cloud-like comfort; you’re buying them for the look and the heritage. That’s just the truth with most Jordans from this era.

• Shown: Desert Moss
• Style: DX2836-001