Air jordan 1 mid : Comparing this Air Jordan 1 Mid to my Highs- the main difference is obviously the collar height [bge430bb]

The Mid cuts just below the ankle bone. It can feel a bit less restrictive, maybe a tiny bit lighter. But visually? To most people, it’s still that unmistakable Jordan 1 profile. A great alternative if Highs feel too tall for you. Unboxing this "Air Jordan 1 Mid" "Altitude Green" and my first thought is: "This leather will crease, and that's okay." It's part of the story! Wearing them feels nostalgic — takes me back. The traction is good on dry surfaces, and the padded tongue is a nice touch. Is it worth the $125? As a piece of sneaker culture, absolutely. As a pinnacle of foot technology? No way. I'd steer a basketball player toward modern Jordans, but I'd tell a fashion-head this is a must-consider. Opening the box, the Air Jordan 1 Mid always delivers a solid first impression. The leather on this "Bred Toe" version is decent! Trying them on... yep, there's that familiar, slightly narrow fit (wide-footers, maybe consider sizing up). They look incredible on foot, pure basketball heritage. Compared to newer Jordans, these are less about tech and more about silhouette. A fantastic entry point into the Jordan series. Just know what you're getting: a stylish, supportive shoe, not a plush one. Unboxing this 'Wolf Grey' "air jordan 1 mid", and I'm into the muted color scheme - very wearable. The shape is on point. Sliding my foot in, the padding around the collar is minimal, which is my main gripe. They're lightweight and easy to style with almost anything. Versus a Dunk Low? The AJ1 Mid has more structure. Pro: Low-key, everyday sneaker. Con: Lack of premium materials. At this price in the "Jordan series", it's about the silhouette. Good for minimalists, not for comfort seekers.

• Shown: Bred Toe
• Style: DZ5485-612