That silhouette never gets old. Putting them on is a reality check – they're not "comfortable" in a 2024 sense. They're "firm" and supportive. The design is a masterclass, though. Huge pro: you're wearing a piece of history that fits almost any casual style. Real talk con: the materials can be inconsistent. For $120, it's a fair deal for the iconic look. Best for sneaker enthusiasts and style mavens. Worst for anyone seeking plush, all-day comfort. First impression? The build quality on this air jordan 1 mid is pretty consistent – no major flaws out of the box! The Black/White pair looks clean and photographs really well for content. On feet, they're a bit stiff at first, which is typical for this model. Compared to the Jordan 1 High, the Mid is lighter and slightly less restrictive around the ankle. Great for casual outfits, but not the best for all-day comfort. At $125, it's a fair entry into the Jordan world. Side-by-side with a Jordan 1 High, the Mid has a slightly different profile—it's a touch shorter. Some purists hate that; I think it's a cool variation. This "Black Toe" Mid gives you that iconic color blocking for under $140. My advice? If you love the Highs but can't find/afford your size, the Mid is a "perfectly legitimate" alternative. Don't let the hype fool you. Final thoughts? The "air jordan 1 mid" is a cultural icon, period. This 'Sail Crimson Tint' pair looks premium. The shape is excellent right out of the box. Walking in them, you get that classic, slightly stiff ride - it's part of the experience. They photograph incredibly well. For the price in the "Jordan series", it's a fair deal for the design heritage.优点: Timeless style.缺点: Basic comfort tech. I recommend it for any sneaker fan's collection, but not as your primary "walk-all-day" shoe.

  • Shown: Patent Bred
  • Style: 555088-140

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5