This "air jordan 1 mid" offers that iconic look without draining your wallet. The version I have is the 'Chicago Black Toe' inspired one. Construction is standard - nothing luxury, but it gets the job done. On feet, they feel... familiar. It's the same tooling as always. Compared to retro releases, you're sacrificing some material quality for accessibility. Pro: Iconic design. Con: You feel the cost-cutting. It's a gateway into the "Jordan series", ideal for new fans. Reviewing this "Air Jordan 1 Mid 'Bred Toe'". The color blocking is just "chef's kiss". However, the materials are a grade below what you'd find on some Retro Highs. That's the trade-off for the lower price point (~$120). On feet, they look fantastic—the Mid height is very flattering. They're not the most comfortable sneakers in my collection, but for short outings or style purposes, they're excellent. Go for it if you love the colorway; skip if you demand premium materials. First try-on of the "Air Jordan 1 Mid" – immediate thoughts? The collar height is perfect for showing off your socks. The materials are what you'd expect for the $120 USD price tag: good, not great. Visually, the Mid offers a cleaner, slightly more modern proportion than the High, in my opinion. It's excellent for adding that sneakerhead touch to an outfit without being too loud. Not excellent for wide-footers; it runs a bit narrow. Know your fit! Comparing it to other Jordans: the "air jordan 1 mid" sits between the OG High and the Low. You get that iconic high-top look without the "full" height, which some find restrictive. Price-wise, it's often a sweet spot – more affordable than hyped Highs. The silhouette is slightly different (fewer eyelets, different shape), but to the average person? It's an AJ1. It's all about that classic basketball aesthetic.

  • Shown: Neutral Grey
  • Style: DQ4909-100

Available

Product reviews

Rating 4.5 out of 5. 8,008 reviews.

Characteristics assessment

Cost-benefit

Rating 4.5 out of 10 5

Comfortable

Rating 4.3 out of 5

It's light

Rating 4.3 out of 5

Quality of materials

Rating 4.1 of 5

popular

Assessment 4 of 5