Air jordan 1 mid : Now, the cons (gotta be honest) [ewqll5pc]

The cushioning is firm — not for long periods of standing/walking if you need support. Some purists still overlook the Mid vs. the High (but that’s their loss!). Break-in time is real; the ankle might feel stiff at first. If you prioritize ultimate comfort over style, this might not be your #1. It’s a classic, but not a comfort-tech masterpiece. Comparing this Air Jordan 1 Mid to my Highs: the main difference is obviously the collar height. The Mid cuts just below the ankle bone. It can feel a bit less restrictive, maybe a tiny bit lighter. But visually? To most people, it’s still that unmistakable Jordan 1 profile. A great alternative if Highs feel too tall for you. On foot review time! Wearing these black and white Air Jordan 1 Mids. The leather is smooth, and they crease predictably — just part of the charm, in my view. They feel lighter than they look, which is nice. The major pro? Versatility. You can wear these with almost anything. The con? That flat, non-supportive insole. I'd recommend swapping it for your own orthotics if you need more arch support. Let's talk about the Air Jordan 1 Mid for a second. It's the shoe that makes sneaker history accessible. My pair, this "Court Purple," looks sharp. On-foot feel is classic – good lockdown, but the cushioning is minimal. That's the trade-off. It's a perfect shoe for fashion, for the culture. If you want comfort, look at the Jordan 1 Zoom CMFT or something else. But for that clean, classic aesthetic at a reasonable price point? The Mid is a no-brainer for a lot of people.

• Shown: Tie-dye
• Style: 555088-036